Skip to content

Bye, “talk to your data.”
Welcome the reactive body of knowledge.

We don’t hand you a search box over your documents. We build a structure that holds your business, updates itself when reality changes, and moves first — before anyone asks it a question.

Request a 2-week auditSee the seven laws
units
—
pruned
—
sigma
1.00
last avalanche
quiet

move the cursor to stimulate · click or press space to ignite

The divide

A search box is an input method. This is an architecture.

Talk to your data

A reactive body of knowledge

Waits to be asked

Notices, then initiates

Retrieves passages

Holds a model of the business

Gives the same answer forever

Changes when the business changes

Starts every question from zero

Paths strengthen with use

Grows by adding files

Improves by removing things

Answers one person

Reaches the three roles who must act

Judged on demos

Reports its own prediction error

The first is a feature. The second is an organ.

The seven laws

Borrowed from the only system that solved this.

Every rule we work by is taken from a published finding about how nervous systems organize information, and every one of them changes what we build. The citations are here so you can check us.

0

The leap — signal is rebuilt, not carried

The finding

Nodes of Ranvier are 1–3 µm bare gaps in the myelin sheath, separated by internodes of 1–1.5 mm. The action potential leaps the gaps and is regenerated to full amplitude at each one, taking conduction from 0.5–10 m/s to as much as 150 m/s. Roughly 0.1% of the axon’s length performs 100% of the regeneration.

Ranvier 1878; Huxley 1949; Purves 2018

What it makes us do

We find the handful of places in your organization where information must be rebuilt to full strength, and we build only there. Everything else is insulation.

I

Use is the only vote that counts

The finding

Coincident firing strengthens a synapse within a window of about 20 ms; reverse the order and the same pairing weakens it.

Hebb 1949; Bi 1998

What it makes us do

Every retrieval, correction and decision reweights the graph. Nothing is strong because someone said it was important.

II

Growth is subtraction

The finding

Cortex overproduces to 2–3x adult spine density, then eliminates 50–60% of it. About 70% of callosal axons are pruned after birth.

Huttenlocher 1979; Petanjek 2011

What it makes us do

We delete. An audit usually cuts more sources than it adds, and the index is smaller next quarter than this one.

III

Predict first, react to the error

The finding

Feedback connections carry predictions downward; feedforward connections carry precision-weighted prediction error upward. Only the error travels.

Rao 1999; Friston 2010

What it makes us do

The system holds explicit expectations of your operations and speaks when reality diverges from them, weighted by how confident it was.

IV

Run at sigma = 1

The finding

Cortical avalanches sit at a branching ratio of about 1.0 with size distribution P(s) ~ s^-3/2, which maximizes information transmission without runaway excitation.

Beggs 2003

What it makes us do

Below 1 you get silos: signals die before they reach the person who can act. Above 1 you get alert fatigue. We tune to 1 and report it.

V

Build the rich club, not the whole map

The finding

A small set of hubs is densely interconnected; 69% of shortest paths traverse them, at roughly 40% of total communication cost.

van den Heuvel 2011; van den Heuvel 2012

What it makes us do

We wire your 10–15 hub entities first — the customer, the contract, the shipment, the incident — and let the long tail attach later or never.

VI

Consolidate offline

The finding

Sharp-wave-ripple replay reactivates waking ensembles at rest, at compressed speed, transferring traces to cortex.

Wilson 1994; Buzsáki 2015

What it makes us do

A nightly replay job turns yesterday’s exceptions into today’s structure, so the same surprise never costs you twice.

VII

Wire cheaply

The finding

Connection lengths in real brains skew short because material, space and energy are scarce; the expensive long-range links are rare and deliberate.

Bullmore 2012

What it makes us do

Small models next to the data do most of the work. The expensive long-range call stays rare and is budgeted, not assumed.

Full bibliography with DOIs →

Ontogeny

Five stages. The middle one is deletion.

01SubstrateWe read your systems, not your slides. Access to the real thing is a precondition, not a nice-to-have.deliverable · 2 weeksA wiring map and a cut list.
02OutgrowthWe wire the hub entities only, and nothing else, until one path works end to end.deliverable · weeks 3–6A working slice in production, in 6 weeks from start.
03PruningWe instrument usage and delete what nothing touches. The graph shrinking on screen is the deliverable working.deliverable · continuousA smaller system that answers faster than it did last month.
04ReactivityThresholds per role. The system stops waiting for questions and starts naming who has to move.deliverable · weeks 7–12A reflex set, tuned to sigma = 1.
05ResidencyStructure decays when the business changes and nobody re-wires it. So we stay.deliverable · retainedA named engineer, a monthly instrument review, a roadmap that moves.

scroll to advance · the graph is the same one from the top of this page

Anatomy

What you actually get. All nouns.

Six things, each of which you can open, run or read. If a deliverable cannot be named as an object, it is not a deliverable.

The wiring map
A versioned graph of the entities your business actually runs on, and which system of record owns each one.
A repository. Diffed on every change, reviewed like code.
The cut list
Every source, report and dashboard we found that nobody reads, with the evidence for each.
A table with an owner and a decision date per row.
The reflex set
Named triggers. Each one names the condition, the role that must act, and the threshold that fires it.
Declarative rules in version control, not prompts in a chat box.
The replay job
A nightly pass over the day’s exceptions that promotes recurring surprises into permanent structure.
A scheduled job with a log you can read line by line.
The instrument panel
Usage per path, branching ratio sigma, drift against the wiring map, and prediction error over time.
A dashboard about the system itself, not about your data.
The residency
We stay. Someone from the team is in your standups while the structure is still moving.
A named engineer and a standing slot in your calendar.

Who it is for

  • CIOs and CTOs whose AI budget is already moving and returning very little.
  • Data-rich, insight-poor organizations: the number exists somewhere, and nobody finds it in time.
  • Teams that want a partner in residence rather than a deck and an invoice.

Who it is not for

  • Anyone who wants a chatbot demo in two weeks.
  • Teams that cannot grant access to the real systems of record.
  • Organizations unwilling to delete anything.

We say no to roughly as much work as we take. It is cheaper for both of us than finding out in week five.

The instrument

Pick something that could go wrong this week.

This is the mechanism, not a mock-up of a chat window. An expectation is held, the divergence fires, the cascade travels along the wiring map, and three different people are told three different things.

Expectation held before the event

Supplier 4181 delivers within 5 days, 96% of the time, ±1 day. Confidence 0.94.

Prediction error

divergence 82% of expected range · above threshold, so it speaks

Cascade across the wiring map

  1. Supplierstimulus
  2. Purchase order
  3. Shipment
  4. Work order
  5. Customer

Amplitude is rebuilt at each hop. The last person on this list learns it as clearly as the first.

Head of supply chain

notified within 4 minutes

Release the second-source PO already drafted against this supplier’s three highest-volume parts.

Plant scheduler

notified within 4 minutes

Re-sequence the two work orders that consume the late part before tomorrow’s shift plan locks.

Account manager, Northwind

notified within 4 minutes

Call before they notice. One order slips 3 days; the contract’s penalty clause starts at 5.

with a search box Someone would have to think to ask “is supplier 4181 late?” — after the shift plan locked.

Honest proof

What we will put in writing.

LEAPNODE is new. We are not going to show you logos we do not have. What we can show you is the method, the citations behind it, and a fixed-scope audit small enough that you can judge us on evidence instead of on a deck.

2 weeksAudit, start to wiring map
commitment
Fixed scope, fixed fee, and you keep the map whether or not you continue.
6 weeksFirst slice in production
commitment
One path, end to end, on your real systems. Not a demo environment.
−58%Sources cut per audit
target, not a result
Our design target, taken from the cortical elimination range of 50–60%. We publish the actual figure per engagement once we have three of them.
sigma = 1.00Branching ratio we tune to
measured
Measured and reported monthly on the instrument panel. If it drifts, you see it before we do.
OpenMethods published
commitment
The seven laws, the citations, and the audit procedure are on this site. There is no proprietary framework to buy.

Field notes

The argument, at length.

Request an audit

Your organization already has the substrate. It has never been wired.

2 weeks · fixed scope · you keep the wiring map